Skip to main content

A worked reading

See an agreement become its business system

Saved as it was read, from the sample agreement every other page follows. See the clause behind every finding.

Source and saved reading

Worked example

Transformer delivery and commissioning

clause 4.7

The Provider shall complete commissioning by the end of week 36.

The transformer reaches site in week 30. Liquidated Damages are AUD 4,200 per day.

The exact wording stays attached to what Nebula builds from it.

Delivery model

Requirement
Complete commissioning by the end of week 36.
Responsibility
Calder Transformer Services
Delivery effect
The week 36 completion, the week 30 delivery dependency and the AUD 4,200 daily delay exposure remain connected.
Provenance
clause 4.7 · source wording retained
WHAT NEBULA READSWHAT NEBULA FOUNDTransformer delivery and commissioning80 pages / Section 4 / obligationsTHIS AGREEMENT is between the Principal and the Providerfor the supply, delivery and commissioning of thetransformer described in Schedule 1, on the terms below.2.DELIVERY2.3The transformer is delivered to site in week 30.Transport, access and cranage are in Schedule 2.2.6Risk passes to the Principal on delivery.4.OBLIGATIONS4.7The Provider shallcomplete commissioning by the end of week 36.The commissioning tests are set out in Schedule 5.6.CLAIMS AND PAYMENTEach claim is made against the Payment Schedulewith a valid tax invoice, exclusive of GST, and:6.2The Principal responds to a claim in 10 business days.The response and its reasons stay on the record.6.4The responded amount is payable in 30 days.8.VARIATIONSA variation is priced and approved before the workproceeds, and its programme effect is stated.12.GENERALWarranties, insurance and notices are in Schedule 6.readingOBLIGATIONDeliverableTransformer to site, week 30OBLIGATIONMilestoneCommissioning, end of week 36DETAILResponse windowRespond within 10 business daysDETAILPaymentResponded amount, 30 days

Saved Nebula reading

Reading confidence 86%

A supply and commissioning agreement between Harbourline Power Pty Ltd (the Principal) and Calder Transformer Services (the Provider)

Parties
Calder Transformer Services and Harbourline Power Pty Ltd
Engagement value
AUD 1,180,000
Completion
End of week 36
Payment timing
payable 30 days from the response

What matters

  • Six milestone payments totalling AUD 1,180,000, from design to handover.

  • Commissioning is due by the end of week 36. Late completion attracts liquidated damages of AUD 4,200 per day. Clause 4.7 sets the date and clause 9.2 supplies the rate.

  • Human steer: set the outage window dates for energisation when you want to change Nebula's prepared programme.

Review the obligations

You see the warning issued and the escalation recorded when a deadline you trusted from this reading passes unanswered.

Calder Transformer Services shall complete commissioning by the end of week 36; late completion attracts liquidated damages of AUD 4,200 per day under clause 9.2.

clause 4.7

Calder Transformer Services must deliver the transformer to site in week 30; risk passes to the Principal on delivery under clause 2.6.

clause 2.3

Harbourline Power Pty Ltd must respond to each claim within 10 business days, with the reasons recorded.

clause 6.2

Harbourline Power Pty Ltd must pay the responded amount of each claim.

clause 6.4
Review the payment schedule

Once delivery runs, you submit payment claims against this schedule, record certification, and carry any shortfall forward until it is discharged.

AUD 1,180,000GST excluded, six milestones

M1Design and shop drawings

AUD 120,000

M2Factory acceptance test

AUD 180,000

M3Delivery to site (week 30)

AUD 380,000

M4Installation and connection

AUD 200,000

M5Commissioning and energisation (week 36)

AUD 220,000

M6As-built records and handover

AUD 80,000

CRITICAL PATHIllustrative scheduleWk 061218243036planned finish · wk 36 · 4.7Design and drawingsM1Switchgear supplyPO-02Transformer build and FATM2Delivery to siteM3InstallationM4CommissioningM5 · wk 36Controls the scheduled finishHas scheduling flexibilityThe fortnight slip recalculates later work

Carry this reading into the engagement. Nebula produces the source-traced deliverable your discipline calls for; you decide each.

Read your own agreementCompare plans

Model assurance

Choose a reading model for the work

You choose from reading models that have passed Nebula’s benchmark and are available for your plan.

How Nebula chooses and checks a reading model

If a model cannot receive your document directly, you get the reading from its extracted text instead.

Capability matched

You get a supported path for your document and the reading step it needs.

One assurance standard

Compare any two models on one benchmark.

Authority stays human

You hold the authority. A model's confidence never approves anything on your behalf.

Every model offered here met the same measured bar

Models meeting it
4
Requirements found
65 of 73
Grounded in the source
94%

Read these as the floor, not the best result: the lowest figures across the models currently offered, from the committed baselines. You are not offered a model without a measured baseline.

What the benchmark holds
  • A gold set of 73 requirements drawn from the benchmark agreement, each tied to the source wording that supports it.
  • Per launched model: recall against the gold set, grounding fidelity, calibration, reasoning and evidence quality, saved as a baseline file.
  • Read the baselines at docs/bench/session-baselines in the product repository; the figures above are computed from those files when this page is built. Ask for the files through the enterprise review.

You see the source and the reading’s own confidence side by side, never one smoothed answer. Dispute a reading and it stays visibly disputed in your record.

The dispute brief

You generate a dispute brief holding the chronology, evidence and both positions in one document, marked as Nebula’s reading for your review, never as impartial evidence.