Skip to main content

Worked reading specimen

A saved reading of the sample agreement

This page presents a saved Nebula reading of the sample agreement the whole product story follows. Each displayed finding remains linked to the clause that supports it.

Source and saved delivery record

Worked specimen

Transformer delivery and commissioning

clause 4.7

The Provider shall complete commissioning by the end of week 36.

The transformer reaches site in week 30. Liquidated Damages are AUD 4,200 per day.

The exact wording remains attached to what Nebula builds from it.

Delivery model

Requirement
Complete commissioning by the end of week 36.
Responsibility
Calder Transformer Services
Delivery effect
The week 36 completion, the week 30 delivery dependency and the AUD 4,200 daily delay exposure remain connected.
Provenance
clause 4.7 · source wording retained

Saved Nebula reading

Reading confidence 86%

A supply and commissioning agreement between Harbourline Power Pty Ltd (the Principal) and Calder Transformer Services (the Provider)

Parties
Calder Transformer Services and Harbourline Power Pty Ltd
Engagement value
AUD 1,180,000
Completion
End of week 36
Payment timing
payable 30 days from the response

What matters

  • Six milestone payments totalling AUD 1,180,000, from design to handover.

  • Commissioning is due by the end of week 36. Late completion attracts liquidated damages of AUD 4,200 per day. Clause 4.7 sets the date and clause 9.2 supplies the rate.

  • Schedule 1 refers to the outage window for energisation but does not state its dates. The window requires confirmation.

Review the obligations

Calder Transformer Services shall complete commissioning by the end of week 36; late completion attracts liquidated damages of AUD 4,200 per day under clause 9.2.

clause 4.7

Calder Transformer Services must deliver the transformer to site in week 30; risk passes to the Principal on delivery under clause 2.6.

clause 2.3

Harbourline Power Pty Ltd must respond to each claim within 10 business days, with the reasons recorded.

clause 6.2

Harbourline Power Pty Ltd must pay the responded amount of each claim.

clause 6.4
Review the payment schedule

AUD 1,180,000GST excluded, six milestones

M1Design and shop drawings

AUD 120,000

M2Factory acceptance test

AUD 180,000

M3Delivery to site (week 30)

AUD 380,000

M4Installation and connection

AUD 200,000

M5Commissioning and energisation (week 36)

AUD 220,000

M6As-built records and handover

AUD 80,000

Nebula connects the reading to the engagement and manages the resulting requirements with the source wording attached.

Model assurance

Choose a reading model for the work

You choose from reading models that have passed Nebula’s benchmark and are available for your plan.

How Nebula chooses and checks a reading model

If a model cannot receive the document directly, Nebula uses the available extracted text instead.

Capability matched

Nebula uses a supported path for the document and reading step.

One assurance standard

Recall, grounding, calibration, reasoning and evidence are tested against the same benchmark.

Authority stays human

Model confidence never grants authority or approves an action.

The result behind the standard

Models meeting it
4
Requirements found
65 of 73
Grounded in the source
94%

These are the lowest figures across the models that currently meet the standard, not the best one, taken from the benchmark baselines Nebula commits alongside the code. A model that has not been measured is not offered.

What the benchmark holds
  • A gold set of 73 requirements drawn from the benchmark agreement, each tied to the source wording that supports it.
  • Per launched model: recall against the gold set, grounding fidelity, calibration, reasoning and evidence quality, saved as a baseline file.
  • The baselines live at docs/bench/session-baselines in the product repository, and the figures above are computed from those files when this page is built, never typed into the page. Procurement reviews can request the files through the enterprise review.

Nebula shows the source and the reading’s own confidence instead of smoothing them into one answer, and a disputed reading stays visibly disputed in the record.